Scaling Businesses | The Candidate Experience Problem That's Costing You
There's a number that gets cited a lot in conversations about the cost of getting hiring wrong. The REC puts the cost of a single bad hire at mid-management level at £132,000 when you factor in lost productivity, management time, and the cost of starting again. In fact, we wrote about it: Hiring for Scaling Businesses UK: Why Growth Stalls Without a Recruitment System | Vermelo
It's a useful figure because it's concrete. It gives a CFO or Finance Director something to point at. It makes the case for investing in a proper hiring process in language that a board can understand.
But it only accounts for one person. The one who got the job.
What about everyone else?
The invisible pipeline
For every hire a scaling business makes, there's a pipeline of people who didn't get the role. Depending on how well-known the business is, how attractive the role was and how actively it was marketed, that could be tens or hundreds of candidates.
Each of those people had an experience of your business. They formed a view. And in many cases, particularly in scaling businesses where the hiring process is more improvised than designed - that view may or may not have reflected the business at its best.
It’s not through any lack of care or intention. But because when there's no system, candidate communication is the first thing that falls through the gap. #
The reason: For growing companies there's no one taking ownership of closing the loop. HR is stretched, perhaps onto the next vacancy, sorting out onboarding of the successful hire and hiring managers are busy with the day to day. The ATS sends an automated rejection three weeks after the role was filled, if it sends anything at all. And the candidate - who took time to apply, who perhaps got as far as an interview, who told people they were going for a role at your company - hears nothing, or hears something that doesn't reflect the business they thought they were applying to.
Where poor candidate experience damages your employer brand
The problem with employer brand damage from poor candidate experience is that it doesn't show up on a spreadsheet. There's no line item for it. No invoice arrives. And so it accumulates quietly, in places that are hard to trace back to a root cause.
It shows up in the candidate who tells three colleagues about their experience - not loudly, not publicly, not on Glassdoor necessarily, just in a conversation over lunch. "I applied to that company, I never heard back." In industries where talent pools are tight and professional networks are dense - financial services, insurance, tech, legal - that kind of word travels faster and further than most hiring teams appreciate.
It shows up in the person who would have been perfect for the next role but won't apply again. Candidate pipelines have memory. The people you treat well become future applicants, referrers, and advocates. The people you don't, don't.
It shows up in your ability to attract talent at all. Employer brand isn't built by what you say about yourself on a careers page. It's built by the aggregate experience of every person who has ever interacted with your hiring process including, and perhaps especially, the ones who didn't get the job.
The CIPD Good Work Index 2025 found that employees who have a positive experience of work are significantly more likely to recommend their employer. The same principle applies before someone even joins. The candidate experience is the first chapter of the employee experience. For the majority of people who go through your process, it's the only chapter they get.
Why it gets worse during a growth phase
The cruel irony is that candidate experience tends to deteriorate precisely when it matters most - during a scaling phase when a business is hiring at pace and visibility is increasing.
More roles means more applications. More applications means more people in a pipeline that wasn't designed to handle volume. Hiring managers are being asked to interview for multiple roles simultaneously while doing their actual jobs. HR is processing offers, managing onboarding and handling employment queries at the same time as trying to run recruitment for ten open positions.
In that environment, candidate communication isn't neglected out of indifference. It's neglected because it's genuinely hard to prioritise when everything else is at full speed. But the people experiencing that neglect don't know that. They just know that they applied to a business that was growing, that seemed exciting, that presented itself well and were then ignored.
At the exact moment your profile is highest and your talent need is greatest, you're leaving the worst impression on the most people.
What fixing it actually looks like
The good news is that candidate experience isn't a separate problem requiring a separate solution. It's a symptom of the same underlying issue as every other hiring problem in a scaling business: the absence of a system.
When an embedded recruiter is working inside your business, candidate communication is one of the first things that visibly improves, not because it's been identified as a priority in isolation, but because there's now someone whose job it is to manage the pipeline end to end. Every candidate knows where they stand. Decisions are communicated promptly and respectfully. The loop gets closed.
That's not a small thing. It's the difference between a candidate who didn't get the role this time but thinks well of you, and one who writes you off entirely.
A hiring system doesn't just make the hire better. It makes the experience better for everyone who went through the process and that has a compounding effect on your ability to attract talent in every future hiring cycle.
About Vermelo
Vermelo works with scaling UK businesses across a variety of industries including regulated sectors to design and operate talent acquisition systems that deliver immediate hiring results and long-term capability. If hiring is holding your growth back, let's talk:
Santa.benga@VermeloRPO.com | 07304 094171
Not sure what you are looking for? Try our solution finder: